[gwyllion]

Redelijke sterke argumenten op het 10/10 forum:

Originally Posted by scandinavic

Where you where when:
1.- BMW sttrugled in the early 2000's to match Alfa pace and was listened by FIA.
2.- BMW took 500rpm more than the rest because its 6cylindre engine....any engine especialist has ever seen a disadvantage in running 8500rpm in a 6cyl compared to a 4cyl.
3.- What about Alfa last year when they had 20 Kg less in Oschersleben and 10Kg for the rest of the season just because only Farfus was able to make the car go fast?
4.-What about Chevy...they spend the minimum budget possible in developing and they just complain and get: engine advantage (13hp more), weight advantages......that must be really discorageous for the rest.
5.- BMW again had an extra final ratio for Puebla 2006 because top speed was lower....then, what is the disadvantage of having only 5 final ratios..if they ask they get when they need!!!

Originally Posted by scandinavic

I understand SEAT complains although there is no need to threaten of pulling out........they only got a rubish flat floor that at 80mm from the ground I don't think is doing too much!!!
I don't understand VETERAN,MOONNA, KNOWLESY and some others.....I don't think the Leon is so bad, I don't think they started to complain after Curitiba07....they complained all through the 2006 season but the FIA didn't want to see that thanks to the incredible 2006 driver line-up supported on always a couple of cars were light, the championship was alive......If KNOWLESY thinks is pathetic, let's let all the FWD go and close the championship!!!!

Who is been the champion for the last 4 years in a row....BMW...ok either Alfa(some year's ago), Seat, Chevrolet, Volvo, Honda......are stupid or maybe the rules doesn't allow a FWD to match a RWD.